API contracts and everything I wish I knew: a frontend survival guide

You’re a frontend engineer. It’s 3 AM. Why does the backend suddenly return null for email addresses that, just yesterday, were working? Turns out, the backend team deployed “a small fix” without telling anyone. Does remembering a scenario like this trigger an actual pain response in you?

Well, I’m writing this from 2025 back to the past me.

Hire Evil Martians

Talk to us about scaling your project, optimizing APIs, and fixing bottlenecks!

Book a call

Dear me, I now live in a glorious future where I haven’t touched a broken backend staging environment in months. This is a brave new world where I am literally never bludgeoned with phrases like the “backend isn’t ready yet”. Here, integration bugs are so rare that when one actually shows up, the team gathers and stares at it as if an illusive yeti somehow wandered into the office.

In hindsight, the majority of the pain wasn’t in the complexity of the system, it was all about the approach. In fact, most API problems don’t come from complexity, they come from how we start the building process.

TL;DR we write the backend code first and the API takes shape along the way.

Then, of course, we try to “integrate” and everything falls apart, as the frontend team is left to “guess” the shape of the data while backend follows internal logic. Nobody agrees on anything.

And following the same playbook means repeating the same mistakes: write the backend, expose it, hope for the best.

Let’s go hard on this issue, and we’ll look at three serious problem symptoms and scenarios in detail as well as their common root cause. We’ll also discuss how they negatively impact everything related to development and how to fix the problem. Then, we’ll look at the results of changing our approach, and why this absolutely matters for both your project’s overall business, your team, and the frontend developer experience!

Symptom 1: backend-first API design = frontend hell

Here’s an example situation: you ask for a simple Boolean flag to show a “Premium” badge, the backend team questions why this is necessary, and you spend 30 minutes in Slack explaining the UI logic to team members who’ve never actually seen the design. (Yes, the same way us frontend developers implement designs without ever asking “wait, where does this data actually come from?“)

What’s going on?

Well, in general, backend builds APIs, but it’s not for us frontend engineers, it’s not for the sake of the user interface …it’s for themselves. (Though to be fair, us frontend developers name our CSS classes things like .big-red-button and then wonder why the design system is impossible to maintain.) The root causes of this include:

Database-first thinking:

• The data structure mirrors their database schema exactly, because “what’s in the DB goes in the API”
• Consequences: Your API returns 47 fields when you need 3, and you need to make three separate requests to render what should clearly be one component

Design blindness:

• The backend team has never actually seen the design or user workflows
• Consequences: You can be missing that one key field that makes your feature work, requiring additional validation and data transformation

The result? You’re parsing, filtering, and aggregating data that should’ve arrived ready-to-use. You’re writing “dirty” checks for null values that shouldn’t exist. You’re transforming data that’s already been transformed twice. Your frontend becomes a mini-backend, doing work that should have been done once, properly, on the server.

Symptom #2: the “Backend Isn’t Ready” bottleneck

Another scenario: remember that e-commerce project? The backend has been “almost ready” …for a month straight. You can’t develop locally until their API is deployed somewhere. Your feature is designed, your components are built, but you can’t merge because there is no data source.

So, the frontend team waits for backend to “decide” to build the endpoint, they decide to build with fake data, and then, of course, they will rebuild everything when the real API has different field names. Double work. Triple work. Because the assumed data never matches reality.

Symptom #3: API changes without warning

Yet another scenario: let’s say that your user list stopped working last Tuesday. As it turns out, this time, backend “optimized” the endpoint and changed the response format. Your production app is returning empty arrays. No warning. No discussion. No nothing.

The real problem: Backend makes changes unilaterally. Zero transparency. They decide what to change, when to change it, and how to change it—without involving the teams that depend on those APIs.

You only find out when things break in production. Your app behaves differently depending on which environment you’re testing, because changes get deployed to different environments at different times without coordination.

It’s like debugging roulette, and you’re always playing on someone else’s board.

The root problem: no reliable system for team coordination

In fact, the three problems above are not the root issue itself. Rather, they are the symptoms of a bigger problem: no reliable and repeatable way to coordinate between teams.

This communication breakdown happens everywhere: between product and design, design and frontend, marketing and everyone else. But the API layer between frontend and backend is where it hurts most.

That’s because this is where two complex systems have to work together perfectly, and right now they’re coordinating through Slack DMs (and wishful thinking).

Meanwhile, everyone just wants to write their code. Laying on top of the organization issues, this can also make communication feel like it’s interrupting the “real work.”

When teams don’t have systematic communication, each team solves local problems without seeing the full picture. This leads to neglecting upfront conversations, building what “makes sense” in isolation, then showing up at integration time with “it works for me, so work around it.”

The inevitable dysfunction: Backend defines APIs based on internal logic while the frontend team guesses what might come out. No shared source of truth, no structured discussion, just assumptions and mismatched expectations. Every integration becomes a negotiation, every bug a symptom of misalignment. APIs become inconvenient for frontend use, processes stay linear instead of parallel, development speed slows to a crawl, and nobody has a single source of truth.

With this model, bugs aren’t surprising—they’re inevitable. None of this is malicious, it’s simply human nature. But it’s killing our velocity.

The “contract-first” way

This all sounds and feels like crap. But there’s something that can be done. By flipping the working model from ”agree first, then build”, everything changes.

So, instead of the frontend people waiting for an API to be “ready”, both sides start from the same contract.

This contract should define: what the data should look like, edge cases to expect, and the behavior that matters. This isn’t intended to just be documentation, it’s shared source of truth that comes before any code. As a result:

• Suddenly, everyone is solving the same problem
• Frontend can develop in parallel with confidence
• Backend doesn’t have to guess what UI is needed
• Integration stops being a risky merge point and is simply a non-event

Teams align, timelines tighten, and bugs become rare!

What exactly is an API contract? It’s a machine-readable specification that defines your API before any code gets written. Think OpenAPI (Swagger) specs, GraphQL schemas, or JSON Schema definitions. Not documentation that describes existing code—but a formal specification that drives development.

A real contract defines everything both sides need to know:

• Request and response data structures with exact field types
• Required vs optional fields and validation rules
• HTTP status codes and error response formats
• Authentication requirements and rate limiting
• Examples of actual request/response payloads

Here’s why this changes everything: Instead of the frontend developers waiting for an API to be “ready”, both sides start from the same specification. Frontend generates TypeScript types and mock servers from the contract. Backend implements endpoints that match the contract exactly. Integration becomes plugging together compatible pieces.

The contract IS the coordination system. While Slack threads and meetings leave space for interpretation, contracts remove ambiguity.

Cases where the API changes a field name and breaks the UI can’t happen anymore because, by design, changing a contract means involving both sides.

A proper contract is:

• Written before implementation
• Read and agreed on by both frontend and backend
• Versioned and updated as the feature evolves
• Machine-readable and testable from day one

The key insight: The contract isn’t just a planning document, it’s actually executable. It generates types, validates requests, creates documentation, and enables testing. When the contract changes, both teams know immediately because their tooling breaks.

Teams align around concrete specifications instead of abstract conversations. Timelines become predictable because dependencies disappear. Bugs become rare because mismatched expectations become impossible.

But understand this: contracts are living documents, not concrete you pour once and forget.

When product plans a new feature, contract changes become task zero. Frontend, backend, QA, and design all contribute to updating the contract. Then teams develop in parallel. At cycle’s end, frontend disables mocks on staging and tests real integration. The contract should evolve with your product, not against it.

Going API Contract first, in practice

For anyone reading this, it may not be realistic to change all of this overnight. My intention is to raise awareness of this, and make it so that you are able to recognizes cases where you can speak up and say “how about we try X?” With that, here’s how to make this happen.

1. Design together firsts

Every feature starts with the product, frontend, and backend teams aligning on user flow, data, and constraints. This isn’t extra process—this is the process. Short alignment early prevents weeks of friction later.

Once aligned, write the actual contract. OpenAPI, GraphQL SDL, JSON Schema—pick your flavor. Define request/response shapes, errors, status codes. Capture everything the client depends on.

Keep contracts separate from backend code. Store them in a shared monorepo folder, dedicated contracts repo, or versioned spec directory. Don’t couple contracts to implementation—they degrade into backend docs no one else trusts.

Let the frontend engineers drive the API shape when it makes sense. They understand user needs and UI constraints better than anyone. Backend optimization still matters, but inside a structure that fits the product.

In short, the frontend team shouldn’t just be passive API consumers. They should help design it.

2. Build in parallel, not sequence

Once the contract is shared, backend and frontend implement independently. Everyone knows what to expect. Everyone tests against the same spec.

Skip the local environment nightmare. Spinning up the whole backend locally—Docker, DB migrations, services, configs—means spending days fighting tools instead of building features.

Contract-generated mocks are your secret weapon. They’re faster, more stable, and unblock frontend work instantly. Mocks aren’t perfect, but they’re predictable. Staging environments are often neither.

Here’s a development flow that actually works:

• Use mocks to build and iterate fast
• Use real APIs to test edge cases and integration flows
• Use contracts to keep both aligned

This is how teams ship fast without breaking each other.

3. Generate everything you need

Now you can scaffold real development assets:

• Generate TypeScript types from OpenAPI or GraphQL
• Generate client SDKs and server stubs if needed
• Generate predictable mock data that matches the contract
• Create validation schemas for both sides

The contract becomes your foundation for tooling, not just documentation.

What I wish I could tell CTOs and other decision makers

Let me keep this section brief. If you need to make the case to someone in charge of why this is a worthwhile change, let me explain: the hidden cost of misaligned API development is massive, and it shows up everywhere.

Teams lose days in unstructured debates about field names in Slack threads (while competitors ship and win). The frontend developers work against assumed API schemas while backend optimizes for architecture instead of usability. Then, both teams spend another sprint “wiring together” incompatible pieces (also while competitors ship and win).

Meanwhile, the product suffers. Broken flows, and incomplete data. Clunky interfaces frustrate users, not because your designers are bad, but because the frontend team is forced to bend around whatever the backend happens to expose. LTV tanks.

Sales blames product. Product blames engineering. Engineering blames “legacy”, everyone loses (while competitors ship and win).

To add salt to the wound, as leadership scrambles for answers, your best developers quietly burn out and churn. They didn’t sign up to fight processes, they came to build. Deadlines slip. Confidence drops. Investors stop believing timelines. Armageddon approaches. This timeline is not inevitable!

The impact of the change for developers and business

You might be thinking “this sounds like a lot of work just to avoid some Slack arguments”. Before we go down that rabbit hole, let’s look at some of the benefits I’ve observed:

1. Features ship in parallel. Frontend and backend work simultaneously because they’re building to the same specification. No more “waiting for backend” delays killing a sprint’s velocity. With this, your time-to-market becomes predictable and marketing can actually trust your roadmap dates.
2. When designed with real data constraints in mind, you end up with a UX that actually delivers.
3. Since frontend and backend are developed together from day one, integration bugs evaporate. Likewise, you stop hemorring money on duplicate work.
4. Scaling does not break stuff. This coordination system essentially works with 5 developers the same as it does at 50. Additionally, new hires onboard without destroying team productivity.
5. A better developer experience also means you do not lose senior engineers to competitors with more refined processes!

What I wish I could tell past me

If I could send past me and present you one piece of advice through time: always start with the contract.

This isn’t my advice because it’s some “best practice.” And you shouldn’t do it because some article told you to do it. I’m simply warning you that, otherwise, you could end up wasting hundreds of hours on integration issues that shouldn’t exist.

But let’s be blunt. Fewer bugs, faster dev time, clearer ownership, HAPPIER TEAMS, and a system that scales without falling apart. All of this requires a simple habit shift: talk first, align early, and white the API contract before writing the code.

Knowing that a contract-first approach better doesn’t automatically make it happen! We still need to build the actual infrastructure, and stay tuned, because in the next article, we’ll do exactly that!